In the weeks since the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots launched, there has been a lot of media coverage. The media coverage is very exciting and what I have found to be very interesting is the numb…
In the weeks since the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots launched, there has been a lot of media coverage. The media coverage is very exciting and what I have found to be very interesting is the number of articles that refer to Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics.
Now unless like me you grew up with a sci-fi geek for a father who introduced you to various fictional worlds like those in Star Wars, Star Trek and 2001: A Space Odyssey at a young age, you might not know who Isaac Asimov is, what his Three Laws of Robotics are and why these laws are relevant to the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots.
Isaac Asimov (1920-1992) was an American scientist and writer, best known for his science fiction writings especially short stories. In his writings, Asimov created the Three Laws of Robotics which govern the action of his robot characters. In his stories, the Three Laws were programmed into robots as a safety function. The laws were first stated in the short story Runaround but you can see them in many of his other writings and since then they have shown up in other authors’ work as well.
The Three Laws of Robotics are:
A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
After reading the Three Laws, it might be pretty clear why Mr. Asimov’s ideas are frequently mentioned in media coverage of our campaign to stop fully autonomous weapons. A fully autonomous weapon will most definitely violate the first and second laws of robotics.
To me, the Three Laws seem to be pretty common sense guides for the actions of autonomous robots. It is probably a good idea to protect yourself from being killed by your own machine – ok not probably – it is a good idea to make sure your machine does not kill you! It also is important for us to remember that Asimov recognized that just regular robots with artificial intelligence (not even fully autonomous weapons) could pose a threat to humanity at large so he also added a fourth, or zeroth law, to come before the others:
0. A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.
“But Erin,” you say, “these are just fictional stories; the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots is dealing with how things really will be. We need to focus on reality not fiction!” I hear you but since fully autonomous weapons do not yet exist we need to take what we know about robotics, warfare and law and add a little imagination to foresee some of the possible problems with fully autonomous weapons. Who better to help us consider the possibilities than science fiction writers who have been thinking about these types of issues for decades?
At the moment, Asimov’s Three Laws are currently the closest thing we have to laws explicitly governing the use of fully autonomous weapons. Asimov’s stories often tell tales of how the application of these laws result in robots acting in weird and dangerous ways the programmers did not predict. By articulating some pretty common sense laws for robots and then showing how those laws can have unintended negative consequences when implemented by artificial intelligence, Asimov’s writings may have made the first argument that a set of parameters to guide the actions of fully autonomous weapons will not be sufficient. Even if you did not have a geeky childhood like I did, you can still see the problems with creating fully autonomous weapons. You don’t have to read Asimov, know who HAL is or have a disliking for the Borg to worry that we won’t be able to control how artificial intelligence will interpret our commands and anyone who has tried to use a computer, a printer or a cell phone knows that there is no end to the number of ways technology can go wrong. We need a pre-emptive ban on fully autonomous weapons before it is too late and that is what the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots will be telling the diplomats at the UN in Geneva at the end of the month.
See on stopkillerrobots.ca
The Antropomorphic Robot is only a CPU Chip and a trick of substitution.
The Three Laws of Robotics (often shortened to The Three Laws or Three Laws) are a set of rules devised by the science fiction author Isaac Asimov. The rules were introduced in his 1942 short story “Runaround”, although they had been foreshadowed in a few earlier stories. The Three Laws are:
A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
These form an organizing principle and unifying theme for Asimov’s robotic-based fiction, appearing in his Robot series, the stories linked to it, and his Lucky Starr series of young-adult fiction. The Laws are incorporated into almost all of the positronic robots appearing in his fiction, and cannot be bypassed, being intended as a safety feature. Many of Asimov’s robot-focused stories involve robots behaving in unusual and counter-intuitive ways as an unintended consequence of how the robot applies the Three Laws to the situation in which it finds itself. Other authors working in Asimov’s fictional universe have adopted them and references, often parodic, appear throughout science fiction as well as in other genres.
This cover of I, Robot illustrates the story “Runaround”, the first to list all Three Laws of Robotics.
Laws of robotics
Three Laws of Robotics
by Isaac Asimov
Tilden’s Laws of Robotics
by Mark Tilden
Ethics of AI
The original laws have been altered and elaborated on by Asimov and other authors.
Asimov himself made slight modifications to the first three in various books and short stories to further develop how robots would interact with humans and each other.
In later fiction where robots had taken responsibility for government of whole planets and human civilizations, Asimov also added a fourth, or zeroth law, to precede the others:
0. A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.
The Three Laws, and the zeroth, have pervaded science fiction and are referred to in many books, films, and other media.
Luna and Isis' adventures in South-East Asia
Abandoned, Adopted, Here the ramblings of a transracially adopted British East Asian (British- Hong Kong Chinese)
Het Leven en Werk Creëren waar Jij van Houdt en Nooit van wil Pensioneren.
An utterly idiosyncratic view of the world, ancient and modern, with Peter Kruschwitz
The words and wisdom of a wondering writer.
It's not a disaster.
The Official Blog of: F.J. Gouldner Writer/Philosopher/Warrior
Follow me on Twitter and Instagram @RichyDispatch
What A Dear, Dear Day!
"Because the only people for me are the Mad ones." - Jack Kerouac
Submit your work for FULL FEEDBACK, plus get it performed/showcased at the monthly festival.
A Library of Literary Interestingness
A daily selection of the best content published on WordPress, collected for you by humans who love to read.
The only site where Violet has a voice!
Alice Music for the San Francisco Bay Area
News, Sports, Weather, Traffic and the Best of Sacramento
News, Sports, Weather, Traffic and the Best of SF
@sparehead - surviving and succeeding in a digital world
The way revenge is best served; the way a war was fought; the way a story should be told. ©
Growing a market garden in the Piedmont of Virginia
We've launched our new book!
“A natural-born storyteller with the polish of an accomplished actress and the authentic edge of a seasoned musician.” – Seattle Weekly
Illustrator | Washington, DC
Diane Foug Studio
Where All Things Film Converge
A Blog about Music and Popular Culture
Comics. Music. Culture.
Video games, science fiction, and the occasional curveball.
A Quibbling Sibling Rivalry
Sam Greene - London & Moscow
Res ipsa loquitur ("The thing itself speaks")
independence - autonomy - self-determination
wanderings in the world of social justice/human rights activism
Championing a young, diverse, and inclusive America with a unique mix of smart and irreverent original reporting, lifestyle, and comedic content.